Here is a quick overview of Insider Risk Management (IRM) and Microsoft Defender, two key tools in Microsoft's Zero Trust framework. It's crucial to understand the differences between these tools because each one serves a specific purpose in protecting your organization. By leveraging their unique features, you can create a more effective and comprehensive security strategy. Let's see how they complement each other and why you might choose one over the other in different scenarios.
Insider Risk Management (IRM) focuses on monitoring and alerting on risky behavior, such as data exfiltration and data leaks. It has a wide range of risk indicators, including unusual file downloads, sharing data with unauthorized sites, and more. However, IRM does not stop these actions; it only alerts you after they happen. This means you might catch data leaks after the fact, which can be too late if the damage is already done.
In contrast, Microsoft Defender takes a more proactive approach. It can enforce policies to prevent certain actions, like automatically suspending a user's account if they download too many files. Therefore, Microsoft Defender plays a proactive role in defending your organization.
So, why would you still need IRM if Microsoft Defender is more proactive?
One unique feature of IRM is the HR Connector, which allows integration with HR systems to monitor activities such as employee terminations or resignations. This helps in identifying potential insider threats that could be associated with such events.
Additionally, IRM offers a Case Management Solution, enabling organizations to investigate and manage insider risk cases comprehensively. This includes escalation paths, progress, and ensuring proper resolution of each case.
While Microsoft Defender is more proactive and is an invaluable tool for real-time protection, it can also have drawbacks.
If you're not familiar with the usage patterns of different users or don't have the time and resources to establish detailed policies, you might inadvertently disrupt legitimate work.
For example, field workers or employees visiting clients might need to download large numbers of files. If their accounts are suspended due to a policy, it could prevent them from doing their job and hurt the business.
IRM will help you understand your organization's usage patterns. For example, if you don't know how users typically interact with M365, IRM can reveal these patterns. This insight is crucial, especially when setting up security measures, as it helps you see what's normal and what needs correction. Users are anonymized in IRM, which means that while it monitors the usage patterns and potential risks associated with M365, it does so without compromising user privacy. This anonymization helps ensure that individuals' identities are protected, allowing organizations to gain insights into behaviour trends and potential threats without infringing on personal privacy.
Think of IRM as a security camera that alerts you to suspicious activities, while Microsoft Defender is more like a security guard that can intervene and stop those activities.
IRM provides valuable insights into potential risks, but it doesn't have the power to prevent them. Defender, on the other hand, can take immediate action but requires careful configuration to avoid disrupting normal business operations.
The risk indicators in Insider Risk Management (IRM) are organized into categories that help you monitor different types of activities. These categories are similar to the various components of Microsoft Defender, each designed to protect a specific area of your organization.
This alignment helps create a comprehensive security strategy by covering all potential risks, whether they're from insider actions, external threats, or cloud activities.